This can be dedicated to people which purchase individual stocks. I has shared along with you the ways I have used through the years to select stocks which i have realized to be consistently profitable in actual trading. I prefer to make use of a combination of fundamental and technical analysis for selecting stocks. My experience has shown that successful stock selection involves two steps:
1. Select a stock while using fundamental analysis presented then
2. Confirm that this stock is an uptrend as shown by the 50-Day Exponential Moving Average Line (EMA) being above the 100-Day EMA
This two-step process enhances the odds that this stock you choose will likely be profitable. It offers a signal to offer ETFs that has not performed not surprisingly if it’s 50-Day EMA drops below its 100-Day EMA. It can be another useful means for selecting stocks for covered call writing, yet another kind of strategy.
Fundamental Analysis
Fundamental analysis could be the study of economic data for example earnings, dividends and money flow, which influence the pricing of securities. I use fundamental analysis to aid select securities for future price appreciation. Over time I have used many options for measuring a company’s rate of growth so as to predict its stock’s future price performance. I used methods for example earnings growth and return on equity. I have realized that these methods usually are not always reliable or predictive.
Earning Growth
As an example, corporate net earnings are be subject to vague bookkeeping practices for example depreciation, earnings, inventory adjustment and reserves. These are all be subject to interpretation by accountants. Today more than ever, corporations are under increasing pressure to overpower analyst’s earnings estimates which leads to more aggressive accounting interpretations. Some corporations take special “one time” write-offs on his or her balance sheet for things such as failed mergers or acquisitions, restructuring, unprofitable divisions, failed developing the site, etc. Many times these write-offs usually are not reflected as being a drag on earnings growth but rather arrive as being a footnote with a financial report. These “one time” write-offs occur with an increase of frequency than you might expect. Many firms that make up the Dow Jones Industrial Average took such write-offs.
Return on Equity
Another popular indicator, which I have found is just not necessarily predictive of stock price appreciation, is return on equity (ROE). Conventional wisdom correlates an increased return on equity with successful corporate management that’s maximizing shareholder value (the better the ROE the greater).
Recognise the business is much more successful?
Coca-Cola (KO) having a Return on Equity of 46% or
Merrill Lynch (MER) having a Return on Equity of 18%
The solution is Merrill Lynch by measure. But Coca-Cola includes a much higher ROE. How are these claims possible?
Return on equity is calculated by dividing a company’s net gain by stockholder’s equity. Coca-Cola is so over valued that its stockholder’s equity is simply equal to about 5% from the total monatary amount from the company. The stockholder equity is so small that almost any amount of net gain will develop a favorable ROE.
Merrill Lynch however, has stockholder’s equity equal to 42% from the monatary amount from the company as well as a greater net gain figure to generate a comparable ROE. My point is ROE doesn’t compare apples to apples therefore is not an good relative indicator in comparing company performance.
For additional information about ETFs explore this useful resource: click now
Be First to Comment